Addison, R. M., & Haig, E. C. (2012). A WALK ON THE HUMAN
PERFORMANCE SIDE – PART 1. Performance Improvement, 51(8), 37–41.
doi:10.1002/pfi
The
first of a four-part series, this article from Performance Improvement (Addison &
Haig, 2012) breaks the HPT experience into four organizational levels:
·
Worker/individual/team
·
Work/process
·
Workplace/organization
·
World/society
The first part focuses on the Worker/Individual/Team
dimension and presents the idea that a “performance map” allows the
identification of performance issues in an understandable (to the client), and
timely way. The authors detail the use of the performance map grid and show how
it can both uncover performance issues as well as include the management from
the beginning of the process.
Addision and Haig make the point that “For training to be
part of a solution, we want to be sure the employees do not know how to do the work.” (Addison & Haig, 2012 pg. 38). The grid they propose allows
one to quickly change the focus from Learning to one of the other major
quadrants of Structure, Motivation, or Environment. By having the client/employee
to quickly answer two basic questions and then indicate the answers on the
“Performance Map,” the client/employee quickly sees where issues more likely
lie.
The audience for this article is that of the
practitioner/researcher. It is proposing a set of tools (over the four
articles) that can be used for HPT application in real life. The content is
drawn in part from their own research and publications as well as that of
others (see article references). While the content is explained well, it seems
to be a bit light on the examples of application and research leading up to
their tool proposals.
I like the approach the authors take to performance
analysis. The inclusion of the client at such a fundamental level is a
wonderful way to get buy-in from the get-go with the added benefit of having a
foundation for a rich dialogue upfront in the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment